Firefox By Craig Thomas
Firefox By Craig Thomas Price comparison
Firefox By Craig Thomas Price History
Firefox By Craig Thomas Description
Firefox By Craig Thomas: A Cinematic Masterpiece
If you’re looking to delve into the high-stakes world of espionage and drama, look no further than Firefox By Craig Thomas. Directed by the renowned Clint Eastwood, this thrilling film offers a gripping story that’s sure to capture your attention. Launched on June 1, 2010, this movie combines action and mystery in a way only Eastwood can orchestrate.
Key Features of Firefox By Craig Thomas
- Aspect Ratio: 1.85:1 – This aspect ratio provides a wider visual experience, allowing viewers to immerse themselves fully in the cinematic world.
- Run Time: 2 hours and 17 minutes – Enjoy an extensive narrative packed with suspense and action.
- MPAA Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested) – Suitable for family viewing, but parental discretion is advised.
- Media Format: Multiple Formats including Dolby and Widescreen – Experience high-quality visuals and audio with this versatile format.
- Dubbing and Subtitles: Dubbed in French with English and French subtitles – Enjoy language accessibility, making it easier for non-English speakers to follow the story.
- Studio: Warner Bros – A trusted name in entertainment, ensuring quality production value.
- Actors: Features iconic performances by Clint Eastwood and an ensemble cast including Freddie Jones, David Huffman, and more.
Price Comparison Across Suppliers
When considering the purchase of Firefox By Craig Thomas, it’s vital to compare prices across various platforms. Our price comparison tool highlights fluctuations and offers that can help you find the best deal. Prices vary from different retailers, so be sure to gauge the marketplace for the current offer. With up to 50,000 trending products available, you can easily find competitive pricing for this classic film.
Trends from the 6-Month Price History Chart
The 6-month price history for Firefox By Craig Thomas reveals notable trends. Initially priced higher upon release, the price has gradually decreased, reflecting market demand and competition. This provides an opportune moment to purchase this film at a more affordable price.
Customer Reviews: The Good and the Bad
Customer reviews for Firefox By Craig Thomas offer valuable insight into its strengths and weaknesses. Many viewers laud Clint Eastwood’s directing prowess and the film’s engaging plotline. Reviewers frequently highlight:
- Captivating Storyline: A thrilling blend of action and suspense that keeps you on the edge of your seat.
- Strong Performances: Critics have praised the performances of Eastwood and supporting actors for their compelling portrayals.
- Visuals and Audio: The vivid colors and quality sounds are frequently noted as strong aspects of the film.
However, some viewers find fault with the pacing and a few of the plot elements, suggesting the film could be more tightly edited. While these comments represent a minority, they are worth considering before making a purchase.
Explore Unboxing and Review Videos
Viewers who want to further engage with Firefox By Craig Thomas can find numerous unboxing and review videos on platforms like YouTube. These videos provide a firsthand look at the film’s presentation and additional insights from fellow movie lovers. Exploring these videos can enhance your purchasing decision and provide a deeper understanding of what to expect from the film.
Conclusion: Your Next Movie Night Awaits!
In summary, Firefox By Craig Thomas is a dramatic masterpiece that showcases the best of Clint Eastwood’s talents as a director and star. With a well-developed plot and an experienced cast, this film promises to deliver an unforgettable experience. Don’t miss the chance to add this thrilling film to your collection.
Ready to make your purchase? Compare prices now! Find the best deals on Firefox By Craig Thomas and enjoy the cinematic experience it offers.
Firefox By Craig Thomas Specification
Specification: Firefox By Craig Thomas
|
Firefox By Craig Thomas Reviews (10)
10 reviews for Firefox By Craig Thomas
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Related Products
bruno –
Date un peu maintenant, très bon film à l’époque.
Erik –
Clintan !
davidrichardlisle –
\\\the recipient was very pleased with the dvd.
Kevin G. –
Clint is a ex fighter pilot who suffers from PTSD (I don’t know why they needed to add that to the story) who is asked to steal the most advanced fighter plane ever built. And, it’s Russian. And, Clint just happens to speak Russian. And, to control the weapon systems in the Firefox he must THINK in Russian. It makes me wonder what is really happening in this age of artificial intelligence!
Robert L. Cochran –
This is a pretty good movie with most of the flying action in the last one-third of the movie. I believe that a lot of this movie is actually a social commentary showing the plight of Jews living in Russia. The point of the movie is not necessarily the theft of a military aircraft, but to show the complete and conscienceless brutality with which Russian Jews are treated. Russian Jews are very likely still treated badly by the Russian government today, so perhaps there is a timeless commentary about this film that still rings true.
Let’s look at Mitchell Gant as a commissioned officer. He doesn’t seem to be a good tactician even if he is a great pilot. He can fly, but he has difficulties ensuring his own safe escape with the stolen aircraft. He easily could have circled back to the air field where he took off from, and fired a missile into the hangar, damaging or destroying the second aircraft and killing many or all of the Generals who had the tools to defeat him. Not to mention wounding or killing the First Secretary. But he doesn’t do this. He should have, in order to secure his own escape, but he doesn’t. Perhaps Gant does not have the killing blood in him. I can understand and sympathize with that. But now we quickly see that Gant is not a good strategist. He just flies off in the blue sky, leaving his opponents alive.
The best character in the entire movie is General Vladimirov. Here is a man able to correctly figure out what Gant is doing, what his intentions are, and what the options are for defeating Gant. It is fascinating to watch Vladimirov deploy his forces as he attempts to destroy the stolen aircraft. He does this even with the First Secretary shouting abuse at him. He very nearly succeeds. If he could have vectored the second aircraft, piloted by Voskov, to Gant’s refueling point soon enough, the outcome might have changed in his favor. Mostly because Gant was too timid to see to the destruction of the second aircraft in the hangar, when he had the chance and there was nothing to stop him.
The ending of this movie is correct for a movie that is intended to be a social statement on the plight of Jews in Russia. This movie is overall less of an action/adventure movie than it is a social and political statement about the terrible future for Jews living in Russia, I hope that the lives of these people are better today, after the Cold War, but I fear not.
Dusty –
Hard to believe those effects were made without modern CGI. Good Eastwood flick.
daubreby Laurence –
super film merci beaucoup
Peter Smith –
I recently bought this DVD as an upcoming Christmas gift for my brother-in-law since he likes these kind of movies!!!! Then I was curious about this movie myself so I rented it on YouTube and thought WOW! This is one of those kinds of movies we don’t see or hear about anymore!!!! WELL DONE MR. EASTWOOD!!!!!!
Looking for a GREAT Action flick? “Firefox is for you!!!! CHECK IT OUT, WON’T YOU?
Markus KOLOMAZNIK –
Ist ein gelungener Film ,sehenswert
Kendal Brian Hunter –
As a child, I was impressed by this movie’s setting–the gritty, greasy depiction of the gritty, greasy life in the Soviet Union’s proletariat interior–and the mesmerizing special effects that brought the MiG-31 to life. As an adult, all of this came back to me, with the added awareness of setting, conflict, and dark penumbras.
This is a dark film. So many people die in this movie: the first contact Pavel Upenskoy, the Jew scientists, the Soviet Pilot of the second prototype. Once again, setting is key: this mission is dangerous, death is probable, and failure more than likely. This contrasts with the gala James Bonds movies which (at times) can be life action cartoons, and is a precursor to the high-tension, high-body counts in “24.”
The special effects, thought dated, still hold up. Though they are not as sophisticated 2005’s film “Stealth” or the opening scenes of “Revenge of the Sith,” I could “piece out imperfections with my thoughts . . . And make imaginary puissance.” I’m one of these people who still thrills when Buster Crabbe hops into his obviously model spaceship and blast off form Mongo. Good storytelling can overcome bad special effects, as shown by “Ghostbusters.”
Additionally, this film exemplifies how a book can be faithfully adapted to screen, without damaging the story or the theatrical presentation. Of course, some of the credit goes to the way Craig Thomas wrote the book. It is minimalist character study of Mitchell Gant’s psychodrama within the grim Soviet Union. When Gant sweated, my palms became damp.
Yes, this film is a bit long, but like in “2001,” I think the length added to the setting. The only thing that really could be cut is the bickering of the Soviet Air Marshals and the Premiere. However, that would detract form the setting aspect of the story. We see the hoary heads bang heads as they fumble with the hot potato that Gant has lobbed at them. Picture a cross between the Sith Lords and the Three Stooges, and you capture the tragicomic aspect of this psychothriller.
So, in the light of the Velvet Revolution, is this film relevant? I think so. In 1970, we had a double dose of military nostalgia–“Patton” and “MASH.” In the midst of Vietnam, what did Korea or WWII have to do with anything? In part, it has to do with the common elements of war, warfare, and the warriors. C. S. Lewis spoke of a thought he had while in the service: “This is what Homer wrote about. This is War.”
Similarly, in order to defend life, liberty, and property, (the purpose of the military), we need to inculcate the warriors about the virtue and value of what they are doing. Lewis again has important insight on this issue:
“Those who say that children [or even grownups] must not be frightened may mean two things. They may mean (1) that we must not do anything likely to give the child those haunting, disabling, pathological fears against which ordinary courage is helpless: in fact, phobias. His mind must, if possible, be kept clear of things he can’t bear to think of. Or they may mean (2) that we must try to keep out of his mind the knowledge that he is born into a world of death, violence, wounds, adventure, heroism and cowardice, good and evil.”
“If they mean the first I agree with them: but not if they mean the second. The second would indeed be to give children a false impression and feed them on escapism in the bad sense. There is something ludicrous in the idea of so educating a generation which is born to the . . . atomic bomb. Since it is so likely that they will meet cruel enemies, let them at least have heard of brave knights and heroic courage. Otherwise you are making their destiny not brighter but darker.”
Courage is one of the values that this film portrays, not just with accepting the mission, but most epically as Gant deals with his own personal ghosts of Vietnam. In this sense, “Firefox” is about redemption: Gant, unable to save one Vietnamese girl, is able to save millions of lives by stealing the Firefox and to restore a balance of power between the two nations.
The other part has to do with aesthetics: this is a roping good spy and techno-thriller, and when we are done, we recognize that we have seen a marvelous tale told well. And that is the hallmark of any good story.