Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone With Pop Filter

0
Add to compare
Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone With Pop Filter
Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone With Pop Filter

Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone With Pop Filter Price comparison

Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone With Pop Filter Price History

Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone With Pop Filter Description

Discover the Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone with Pop Filter

The Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone with Pop Filter is an essential tool for musicians, podcasters, and content creators seeking high-quality audio recording. With its impressive specifications and user-friendly design, this microphone delivers professional results at an affordable price. Whether you’re recording in a studio or setting up for a live performance, this microphone is up to the task. Let’s explore what makes the Pyle PDMIC78 standout in the crowded world of audio equipment.

Key Features and Benefits of the Pyle Handheld Microphone

  • Superior Sound Quality: With a frequency response of 50 Hz to 15 kHz, the Pyle microphone captures a broad range of sounds, providing clarity and depth in audio recordings.
  • High Impedance Level: At 600 Ohm, this microphone is ideal for professional use, ensuring compatibility with various audio equipment while minimizing distortion.
  • Pop Filter Inclusion: The integrated pop filter effectively eliminates unwanted plosive sounds, enhancing vocal clarity and ensuring your recordings sound pristine.
  • Sturdy Construction: Made from durable zinc alloy metal, the Pyle handheld microphone offers robust performance, making it perfect for both studio and live applications.
  • Lightweight Design: Weighing just 1.3 pounds, this microphone is easy to handle, allowing for comfortable extended use during lengthy recording sessions.
  • User-Friendly Setup: With a corded electric power source, you can plug and play without worrying about battery life, making setup quick and hassle-free.

Price Comparison for the Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone

The Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone offers a competitive price, especially considering its features. Prices vary across different suppliers, with online retailers frequently offering the best deals. Our price comparison tool allows you to compare the PDMIC78 against other similar models, ensuring you’re getting the most value for your money. As of the latest data, prices start around $49.99 but can fluctuate depending on the retailer and special promotions. By monitoring these prices, you can make an informed purchasing decision.

Trends in Price History

According to the 6-month price history chart, the Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone has shown some interesting trends. While the price remained relatively stable for the first four months, a notable dip occurred during promotional sales events. This trend indicates potential savings for users willing to purchase during key sales times. Keeping an eye on these fluctuations can help you snag a great deal on this popular microphone.

Customer Reviews and Insights

User feedback for the Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone highlights its reliability and sound quality. Many customers have praised its rich audio performance and built-in pop filter, which streamlines their recording process. Users appreciate the easy setup and sturdiness of the microphone, making it a favorite among both amateur and professional audio engineers.

However, a few drawbacks have been noted. Some users experienced issues with background noise in very loud environments. A minority have reported that the microphone may not be ideal for certain instruments; therefore, it’s crucial to assess your specific needs before purchasing. Despite these comments, the majority of reviews remain overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 4.5 stars.

Explore Unboxing and Review Videos

If you’re still undecided, check out some unboxing and review videos available on platforms like YouTube. Many content creators have thoroughly tested the Pyle PDMIC78, showcasing its practical applications, performance capabilities, and setup process. These videos can offer additional insights that might help you envision how this microphone could work for your audio needs.

Why Choose the Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone?

The Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone is not just any audio accessory; it’s a reliable partner for your audio projects. With its combination of exceptional sound quality, rugged design, and competitive pricing, it stands out in the marketplace. It’s perfect for musicians, streamers, and anyone serious about capturing clear audio, making it an excellent investment.

Final Thoughts

In conclusion, if you are seeking a microphone that offers quality, durability, and affordability, look no further than the Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone with Pop Filter. Its remarkable specifications, positive user feedback, and price advantages make it a top choice for anyone in need of a reliable audio solution.

Don’t miss out on the opportunity to enhance your audio experience with this exceptional microphone. Compare prices now!

Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone With Pop Filter Specification

Specification: Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone With Pop Filter

Item Weight

1.3 Pounds

Impedance

600 Ohm

Maximum Frequency

15000 Hz

Microphone Form Factor

microphone only

Minimum Frequency

50 Hz

Item dimensions L x W x H

3.5 x 10 x 5 inches

Power Source

Corded Electric

Material

Zinc Alloy Metal

Signal-to-Noise Ratio

70 dB

Number of Channels

1

Frequency Range

0.05 khz – 15 khz

Frequency Response

15 KHz

Global Trade Identification Number

00611101539995, 00068889007039

Manufacturer

Sound Around

UPC

611101539995 688890070398 823019877919 068889007039 702248798861 012304051107 809198925771

Product Dimensions

3.5 x 10 x 5 inches

Item model number

PDMIC78

Is Discontinued By Manufacturer

No

Date First Available

July 8, 2011

Country of Origin

China

Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone With Pop Filter Reviews (8)

8 reviews for Pyle Dynamic Handheld Microphone With Pop Filter

4.9 out of 5
7
1
0
0
0
Write a review
Show all Most Helpful Highest Rating Lowest Rating
  1. Francisco Javier Pinedo De Anda

    Excelente micrรณfono, muy buen sonido, bastante similar al sm57 a decir verdad

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  2. Hector Valdivia

    Itโ€™s obviously not an SM57, probably not even close, but for the price it is pretty amazing. Overall it feels lighter and not as sturdy than the Shure mic, but that would be a concern only if you plan on using it live. I bought it to record my acoustic guitar in stereo (paired with a Mackie condenser mic) and it does a very good job (after comp and EQ) it has a similar mid, 3k-ish boost as the 57, Iโ€™ve been using it on vocals a lot because it sounds โ€œaggressiveโ€, I would recommend this mic if youโ€™re interested in home recordings, it works great on vocals, guitars and drums, I bought it for $20 or soโ€ฆ with that price you canโ€™t go wrong, at the very least it proved I still love recording guitars and stuff enough to flesh out a hundred bucks and get a real SM57, it would be interesting to see how it holds up against the real thing!

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  3. Gabriel Ortiz

    I bought this microphone simply and almost only because of its great price hoping it would not break on me, distort any sounds or cause impairing feedback while on stage. As a starting musician, my budget was very low and my only posible income came directly from playing a few gigs as a local dive bar, which didn’t pay much, so when the time came to buy a microphone for my guitar amplifier my soul was set to buy a Shure SM-57 due to its undeniable reputation. However, I did not have $100 to spend solely on a microphone so as soon as I saw the Pyle-Pro PDMIC78 on my sugestions bar I was shocked to see a $10 option. I did not think twice about it as I pressed “Proceed to Checkout.”
    Here is my opinion so far:

    FIRST IMPRESSION:
    The package came pretty quickly (under a week!) and is actually very neat (blue box with pictures and information written all over). First thing that you can see in the box is that the microphone is neatly and safely wrapped next to a cheap mic cable (XLR to 1/4″). To be fair, that cable stopped working after two years of severe abuse, which is not at all bad from a free cable that came with a $10 mic. The microphone itself closely resembles the praised SM-57 and is just as heavy. The PDMIC78 is made of metal (HEAVY metal, lol). Mine has been dropped several times from several heights and has not even dented; definitely great material.

    SOUND:
    In terms of how it sounds, it is possibly the closest I have ever heard to the actual SM-57 in this incredible price range!
    Don’t get me wrong here, every microphone is different in some way and the quality of the SM-57 is not comparable to, say, an SM-7B, but as far as a $10 mic can go, the only defining difference between the PDMIC78 and the SM-57 is how much “gain” they capture. I’m not by any means a mic tech and have very basic to intermediate knowledge on how mics work, but when it comes to the mixer, the PDMIC78 requires about 3dB less in the gain control. Since I bought this microphone, its main use has been in front of an amp speaker. I use a considerably small amp (Blackstar HT-40) so my best bet is to mic up the speaker and set the controls however I need them to be. For a full two years the PDMIC78 has been the most reliable microphone in my rig, and I carry an SM-57 now to use the double-mic method.

    CURRENT USE:
    As mentioned above, I use the double-mic method on a 1×12″ speaker cabinet. I am a total sound snob and when I play, I NEED my sound to be as perfect as I can possible get it. Because of that I have chosen to use two microphones and a direct line. So my rig goes like this: I plug in Blackstar’s Emulated Out directly to the main console and use that as a basis for how I want to shape my tone, then I put the SM-57 directly towards the cone’s sweetspot (every speaker has a different one; mine happens to be a little bit off the center) at about two to three inches from the grill cloth. After I play a bit with the mix between the direct and the Shure, I place the PDMIC78 aimed towards the sweetspot at an angle of around a radian or so from the cloth and move it a little bit further away from the SM-57 so as to get a few more tones coming from directly around that sweetspot. When I mix in the three, the direct line is about 4-5dB lower than the mics and has about -3dB on the high frequencies. I boost the low end of the SM-57 a tad bit (depends on the room) and work the mid sections mostly with the Pyle. I’m not using the mics for specific frequencies or so, but I do target what they can do best in they’re position and compensate what they do worst.

    OVERALL:
    This mic has worked wonders in live and studio applications, and has earned an impressive reputation wherever it goes. Sound engineers and musicians alike have gotten speechless simply because of this microphone’s versatile performance and incredible adaptability. I know for sure this mic will be on my rig for years to come, even as a professional musician. For the price listed on Amazon.com, this is a steal. However, A review with only good things to say and no drawbacks isn’t a good review, it’s just advertising. I really wish Pyle-Pro ditched the cheap cable the mic brought and sent a small protective pouch to safely store the mic in. It doesn’t have to be leather (or whatever it is) like Shure makes them, but even a small canvas or microfiber pouch can help ease my mind when I put it inside a bag with clips and mics that could scratch it. Just a bit of help when it comes to caring for your product would be more than nice!

    Thank you for reading this review; Happy Shopping!

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  4. Matteo

    Tra i “cloni” dell’SM57 questo รจ il piรน economico che ho visto e, spinto dalle buone recensioni e dal prezzo bassissimo, l’ho provato: mi ha stupito, รจ SORPRENDENTE per il prezzo (preso a 10โ‚ฌ). Se avete un home studio e poco budget, non pensateci due volte. L’ho testato su voce e chitarre ecustiche e fa il suo sporco lavoro. Tra l’altro sul parlato, perlomeno sulla mia voce, suona particolarmente bene. Unica nota dolente รจ il cavo incluso in confezione, che รจ di qualitร  infima e ha un fruscio che lo rende inutilizzabile, farebbero prima a non inserirlo. In sintesi: Best buy assoluto.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  5. Kyle

    TL:DR–Unbeatable for the price and an hour of your time to beef up the wires. Gave me a great recording at low volume in my apartment, way better than the used and bargain mics I already had. Feels solid, sounds good, will be buying more and recommending to anyone looking to record or amp live!

    After reading the reviews and watching some youtube videos I jumped on this rediculous bargain and could not be happier! It IS NOT an SM57, but it is a great sounding dynamic instrument mic. As soon as I received the mic the rewire began. It really does have very, very thin cheesy wires in it. Probably 26ga or smaller, more insulation than conductor. I went to Lowes and picked up copper strand 16ga, a little bigger than I wanted and a little difficult to work into the housing of the mic during reassembly but I’m sure the increase in signal bandwidth was that much more beneficial. It’s a very simple 2 wire replacement using a small piece of scrap wire to ground pin 1 to the chassis screw and you’re done. The mic is balanced and can handle a larger current making it come to life. I’m not an electrical engineer so I can’t really say what the bullet point benefits are other than the signal isn’t choked by a narrow path anymore.

    I didn’t even bother trying the mic as is because of the number and strength of positive reviews on the rewire, and they were right. I put this up to a Krank Rev Jr 1×12, midway from edge to cap using a Bugera G5 at 0.1w, full gain distrortion, quarter volume, and my Schecter C-1 in Drop C and the results were great using a Focusrite 18i20. I did have the gain at 3/4 to get -12db but I wasn’t able to hear any discoloration, only a full sounding, clear thrash and chug meddley of metal. I’m guessing having 16ga wire all the way around helped deliver the higher power signal with ease. But as I sit here and write this I wonder if the thin cheesy wire continues in the capsule or if the pins the wires are soldered to continue to the diaphram itself…curious.

    At any rate, this mic is worth more than what it costs if you take the time and effort to beef up the power delivery. Much like car audio too small of wire will choke your system and strain it, but after a certain point larger wire is no benefit. You can get a soldering iron for 10 dollars at some major retailers and it will come the solder wire. Watch a few youtube videos and take your time. Even with all that considered, you’ve saved time and money over an SM57. Because, how many hours do you have to work to pay off an SM57? How about a $15 mic, possibly a $10 iron, and an hour of your time? Think about it if you’re serious but skeptical. I was, but now I’m going to buy a few more for general purposes in recording live bands!

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  6. Kyliann jonnaert

    Parfait, un micro adaptรฉ pour ma part dans l’utilisation de performance artistique.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  7. Eric Metcalfe

    Reviews were fairly good on this mic, and took a chance. Good weight and feel to the mic, feels professional. Immediately it’s clear and transparent, I’ve read reviews that said bright or harsh. Through my old analogue Yamaha board it sounded warm and pleasant. Handling noise is tolerable, but definitely not quiet, definitely a difference between this and a Shure 57 that way. A/B’ed this one with my Shure 48 and found it to be very similar, I thought the Shure was brighter actually, the boys in the band said this one sounded clearer. For 17 bucks, I’m thrilled with the mic, we plan on buying a couple more as back ups and drum mics. I’ll likely grab a second one for small gigs I do as well. No idea how it will hold up long term but I will update.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  8. Peter H

    Donโ€™t worry about the brand. Buy it. Sounds really good. Iโ€™ve used other brands in higher price points and itโ€™s still quite comparable in terms of sound quality. For its price, if you got an audio interface/mixer as well, then try it out. Itโ€™s dynamic so obvious youโ€™ll need to bring it closer to your mouth or instrument, but quality is amazing.

    Helpful(0) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this

    Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.

    ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ Discompare.eu
    Logo
    Compare items
    • Total (0)
    Compare
    0